RE: XML Schema draft populates the intersection of Language and InformationResource [ISSUE-14 httpRange-14]

> From: Dan Connolly
> I'd really rather not put 303 redirect configuration in
> the critical path to deployment of garden variety
> Semantic Web data. The <doc#term> technique is available to
> ordinary authors who can only use ftp to upload
> data to the web.

Ordinary authors can use a 303-redirect service like to avoid having to configure their
servers.  This technique can also be combined with the  use of PURLs, so
that the "" prefix does not have to appear
in ontologies.

For example, this PURL URI for me:  
302 redirects to: 
which 303-redirects to:

Creation of that PURL required only registering it at  No
configuration was done at and no registration was needed at

Of course, if also offered 303 redirects instead of only 302's
-- are there any OCLC folks listening? -- this could all be done in one
step instead of two.  Note also that with's "partial redirect"
feature (see ) multiple URIs in an
ontology do not have to be registered individually at

Come to think of it, shouldn't this be covered in the "Cool URIs for the
Semantic Web" document, given that: (a) a 303-redirect service can
significantly reduce a barrier to adoption; and (b) persistence is an
important element in creating "Cool URIs for the Semantic Web"?

David Booth, Ph.D.
HP Software
+1 617 629 8881 office  |

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent
the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Received on Monday, 1 October 2007 19:03:17 UTC