Re: httpRange-14: Consequences of redirection

Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) wrote:
> Hmmm... since I can find neither the word "informational" or "200" in the text to which I responded I have no idea what of what you say you have said you are referring to.
>   
Oh, this is where I said it. 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2007Nov/0015.html

Xiaoshu
> Stuart
> --
> Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
> Registered No: 690597 England
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Xiaoshu Wang [mailto:wangxiao@musc.edu]
>> Sent: 29 November 2007 18:17
>> To: Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)
>> Cc: Tore Eriksson; www-tag@w3.org; sean@miscoranda.com;
>> richard@cyganiak.de
>> Subject: Re: httpRange-14: Consequences of redirection
>>
>> This is part of the argument.  If the *design* of a URI can
>> avoid the answer about the *nature* of its denoted resource,
>> then the evaluated nature is about the *design's nature* but
>> not *resource's nature*.  That is why I said, 200 implies an
>> *informational URI* but not an InformationResource.
>>
>> Xiaoshu
>>
>> Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) wrote:
>>     
>>> Fortunately, :-),
>>>       
>> http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Resource should never
>> make it to the request line of an HTTP request and will have
>> no associated response code. Though of course
>> http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema might.
>>     
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Stuart
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Xiaoshu Wang [mailto:wangxiao@musc.edu]
>>>> Sent: 29 November 2007 16:27
>>>> To: Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)
>>>> Cc: Tore Eriksson; www-tag@w3.org; sean@miscoranda.com;
>>>> richard@cyganiak.de
>>>> Subject: Re: httpRange-14: Consequences of redirection
>>>>
>>>> I don't think which HTTP response pattern/code is the core issue.
>>>> The core issue is if we should be allowed to use any HTTP code to
>>>> judge the nature of a resource.
>>>>
>>>> The fundemental assumption of RDF is that everything is an
>>>>         
>> instance
>>     
>>>> of rdfs:Resource.  If somehow, this fundamental belief can be
>>>> challenged, such as by checking if "rdfs:Resource" returns a
>>>> particular HTTP code, then the entire RDF system itself is already
>>>> put on a shaky ground.
>>>>
>>>> If we want to judge this sort of thing, it must be outside
>>>>         
>> of RDF but
>>     
>>>> not within.  The irony, however, is this - if we don't care to and
>>>> cannot judge if someone does it right or wrong, then why bother?
>>>>
>>>> Xiaoshu
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> --
>>> Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road,
>>>       
>> Bracknell, Berks
>>     
>>> RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>
>

Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 02:37:01 UTC