- From: pkeane <pkeane@mail.utexas.edu>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:11:19 -0500 (CDT)
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- cc: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>, W3C-TAG Group WG <www-tag@w3.org>
XML Matters: XML and compression (David Mertz) http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-matters13.html On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Karl Dubost wrote: > > > > John Cowan (31 oct. 2007 - 05:43) : >> Dan Connolly scripsit: >>>> These leads us to wonder whether a combination GZip with improved >>>> technologies such as Parsers, JDKs, VMs, or even Stack Integration >>>> technology (that is Schema aware and hence covered under Both and >>>> Schema) would suffice for the community. >> >> gzip decoding is expensive in both speed and space, and the speed >> cost is raised even higher because decoding and parsing are >> typically performed as separate steps. > > That would be cool to have a benchmarks table (tests with different > scenarios). > So we could put it online. That would be a useful reference. > Someone has the details handy somewhere? > > > -- > Karl Dubost - W3C > http://www.w3.org/QA/ > Be Strict To Be Cool > > >
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2007 01:52:52 UTC