- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:21:10 -0700
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>
> DanC: I'm disappointed that the document is going in the > opposite of > the direction I advised, which was to integrate the > definitions into > the material so that they're motivated I share the concern.. I also wonder if a standalone terminology doc will just be ignored as being to abstract. BUT, if there's a push to make smaller docs, this is one way to do it. Cheers, Dave
Received on Monday, 21 May 2007 20:21:56 UTC