- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:14:13 -0500
- To: "Chris Bizer" <chris@bizer.de>
- Cc: "Frank Manola" <fmanola@acm.org>, "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>, <semantic-web@w3.org>, "Linking Open Data" <linking-open-data@simile.mit.edu>
>Hi Frank, > >>I'd seriously suggest you look for some >>alternative to "data item" for the concept in >>question. > >OK, but this leads to a question which I >accutally wanted to try to avoid asking on this >list. > >Hmm, I will do it anyway and see what happens ;-) > >Question 4: What term should we use instead? Using the heuristic principle that an artificial coinage is less likely to cause confusion than re-using an existing term with a new meaning, how about 'transmit' used as a noun? What you get back from dereferencing the URI is either a representation<sub>REST</sub> of the resource, when its an information resource, or else a >>transmit<< which describes (in some broad sense) the resource, if its a non-information resource. Or, if this seems too peculiar, call it the 'represented description' or 'redirected description'. Either of these could be abbreviated to 'redescription', which is (arguably) an English word that hasn't been technically re-used too much yet. Because according to your definition, its relationship to the resource is being a description of it, and to the URI is being the representation<sub>REST</sub> of the resource to which the first http endpoint redirects to. Yet another possibility which will confuse only a vanishingly small set of people is 'infon', taken from situation theory where it means something like a coherent chunk of information about something. Pat > >Cheers, > >Chris > > >-- >Chris Bizer >Freie Universität Berlin >Phone: +49 30 838 54057 >Mail: chris@bizer.de >Web: www.bizer.de > >----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Manola" <fmanola@acm.org> >To: "Chris Bizer" <chris@bizer.de> >Cc: "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>; ><www-tag@w3.org>; <semantic-web@w3.org>; >"Linking Open Data" ><linking-open-data@simile.mit.edu> >Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 6:07 PM >Subject: Re: Terminology Question concerning Web Architecture and Linked Data > >>Chris-- >> >>I appreciate that we run into terminology >>conflicts all the time around here, but I'd >>seriously suggest you look for some alternative >>to "data item" for the concept in question. An >>awful lot of people (particularly those >>involved with databases) are used to seeing >>"data item" refer to something like a property >>or attribute (like "name" or "age"). More >>specifically, they're used to seeing records as >>containing multiple data items (or their >>values). From that point of view, the >>sentence "When you interpret the Web of Data as >>a set of interlinked databases, a data item >>would equal a record in a specific database." >>looks particularly strange. As I say, I >>understand the inevitability of terminology >>conflicts, but ...? >> >>Cheers! >> >>--Frank >> >>On Jul 25, 2007, at 10:12 AM, Chris Bizer wrote: >> >>> >>>Hi Tim, >>> >>>>I can't think of a term for "the information >>>>which you get about the thing identified by >>>>it when you look up a URI" which works for >>>>me. >>> >>>>It has of course the term "Representation" >>>>which connects an Information Resource and >>>>the (metadata, bits) pair which you get back, >>>>which is different. >>> >>>As we did not want to repeat the definition >>>all over the tutorial, we ended up with a term >>>called "data item". >>> >>>Within section 2.1 of the tutorial, we define >>>the term as: "The term data items refers to >>>the description of a non-information resource >>>that a client obtains by dereferencing a >>>specific URI that identifies this >>>non-information resource." >>>(http://sites.wiwiss.fu- >>>berlin.de/suhl/bizer/pub/LinkedDataTutorial/#aliases) >>> >>>Note that the definition is a bit more >>>specific than your sentence above, as it is >>>restricted to non-information resources and >>>not things in general (assuming that your term >>>"thing" refers to non- information resources >>>as well as information resources). >>> >>>We were also struggling to find a good word >>>that matches the concept and have chosen "data >>>item" in the end as it somehow relates to the >>>overall term "Linked Data" and as we hope that >>>people from the database community will >>>understand the second informal definition of >>>the term: "When you interpret the Web of Data >>>as a set of interlinked databases, a data item >>>would equal a record in a specific database." >>> >>>Cheers >>> >>>Chris -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 cell phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2007 18:15:44 UTC