- From: Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:58:37 -0700
- To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
It's so nice being thanked publicly I'm afraid I'm now going to feel compelled to devote all my spare time to scouring your doc for further typos! Seriously, thank you, Noah. Howard > -----Original Message----- > From: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com] > Sent: July 24, 2007 11:39 AM > To: Dan Connolly > Cc: Howard Katz; www-tag@w3.org > Subject: Re: Fw: TAG Finding: The use of Metadata in URIs > > The changes suggested by Howard have been made, in place. > Howard: thank > you for taking the trouble to point out these problems. > > -------------------------------------- > Noah Mendelsohn > IBM Corporation > One Rogers Street > Cambridge, MA 02142 > 1-617-693-4036 > -------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> > Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org > 06/19/2007 01:55 PM > > To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com > cc: www-tag@w3.org, Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com> > Subject: Re: Fw: TAG Finding: The use of > Metadata in URIs > > > > On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 17:18 -0400, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > > With his permission, I am forwarding the attached comments > from Howard > > Katz regarding the Metadata in URI TAG finding. My > inclination is to > fix > > these editorial problems in place, I.e. without changing > the date on the > > > finding. > > Yes, these changes look OK to make in-place. > > Thanks for the attention to detail, Howard. > > > "Howard Katz" <howardk@fatdog.com> > > 05/26/2007 02:54 PM > > > > To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> > > cc: > > Subject: TAG Finding: The use of Metadata in URIs > > > > > > Noah, > > Nice work on the Use of Metadata finding. I noticed a few typos I > thought > > you might want to know about: > > > > 1) The heading for "2.8 Confusing or malicious metadata": should be > > left-aligned. > > > > 2) The Good Practice note in the same section: the word > "consistent" is > > misspelled as "constistent". > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2007 18:59:05 UTC