- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 17:45:56 -0400
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Norm Walsh writes: > Did I imply that? That wasn't my intent. No, you didn't, and I apologize for the implication that you implied that :-). Seriously, I've just seen so many people over the years saying "Surely namespaces must be used THIS way", for some variation in the value of THIS, that I had some concern that the apparent endorsement or even the kind words about NVDL might be taken as suggesting that the idioms it best supports were preferred. You didn't say that, but if NVDL is discussed positively (and I have no problem at all with doing so), I think it might be useful to provide nearby a brief reminder of where it fits into the bigger picture, and an indication that the things it does well are often but not always the best way to set up your XML versioning architecture. Sorry for the confusion. -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 --------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 20 July 2007 21:49:22 UTC