- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:09:28 +0100
- To: TAG mailing list <www-tag@w3.org>
Dear TAG members, others, I'll be brief this time. 8-) I've asked on this list earlier [1], what anyone's thoughts were on moving WSDL's safety annotation feature [2] to SAWSDL, as it seems that safety is a perfect example of a semantic annotation. Both WSDL and SAWSDL are currently in CR, but WSDL is moving fast towards PR, that's why any opinions especially from the TAG members would be useful to us. It seems that WSDL doesn't actually need the safety annotation all that much for its function (see [3]). However, the TAG requested that WSDL operations should have a marker about their safety. This is implemented as an attribute in WSDL2. Now that we have SAWSDL, it would seem to fit there better. Do you perhaps think that marking safety in WSDL using SAWSDL is less adequate than using a specific extension attribute? For more information, see [1]. Best regards, Jacek Kopecky [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2007Feb/0003.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-adjuncts/#safety [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2007Feb/0007.html
Received on Monday, 19 February 2007 17:09:43 UTC