Agenda for 12th Feb 2007 TAG Meeting

Folks,

A draft agenda for our call in 5th February is available at:

	http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/tag-weekly

It has been suggested that we maintain a standing agenda a single URI
and update it weekly. I have also saved a snapshot of this agenda at
more familiar location, ie:

	http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2007/02/12-agenda

However, as and if we become comfortable with the archived copy of this
emailed text version being sufficient snapshot of our historic agenda
(without delving down into cvs) along with the record of what we
actually discuss, I may discontinue this practice.

I fear this may bring on a tirade of URI philosophy... but I may be
pleasantly surprised.

Text version below.

Stuart Williams
For W3C TAG
--
   [1]W3C | [2]TAG | Previous: [3]5 February 2007 | Next: 19 February
   2007

      [1] http://www.w3.org/
      [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/
      [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2007/02/05-agenda

            Agenda of 12th February 2007 TAG teleconference

   Nearby: [4]Teleconference details - [5]issues list ([6]handling new
   issues) - [7]www-tag archive - [8]tag archive
    1. Administrative
       Chair: Dan, Scribe: Noah
       Roll call -- Regrets: [9]TimBL, [10]Stuart, Henry?
       Approve [11]minutes of previous meeting
       Accept this agenda?
       Propose next Telcon 19 Feb -- appoint scribe: propose Norm.
    2. Issue [12]RDFinXHTML-35
       Recent heads-up [13]email message from GRDDL-WG chair indicates
       "GRDDL Going to Last Call" and (informally?) requests TAG review
       of:
          + [14]GRDDL Specification
          + [15]GRDDL Primer
          + [16]GRDDL Use Cases
       Beware these are links to Editors Drafts - not LC documents
       Status Updates (Dan?)
          + GRDDL
          + RDFa
       Volunteers to LC review for TAG (in due course). (Stuart?, one
       other?)
    3. Issue [17]utf7Encoding-55
       Most recent Action was to VQ to list and describe the issue -
       showing as completed.
          + What might a finding say?
          + Next steps?
               o More research?
               o Draft a Finding? - Volunteers
               o Defer on some external event? - If so... then what
                 event?
    4. Issue [18]IRIEverywhere-27 and [19]xmlChunk-44
       With [20]XQuery now a recommendation, does this shed new light
       on these two issues?
       DanC has an [21]current action to consult TimBL wrt to
       IRIEverywhere-27, any news?
       [22]xmlChunk-44 also entails XML equivalence (see earlier
       [23]writings by Norm). Does the [24]XQuery/XPath Functions and
       Operators Recommendation help resolve this issue?
    5. Any other issue?
     _________________________________________________________

      [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#telcon
      [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html
      [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Jul/0054.html
      [7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/
      [8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/
      [9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2007Feb/0026.html
     [10] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2007/02/05-tagmem-minutes
     [11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2007/02/05-tagmem-minutes
     [12] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues#RDFinXHTML-35
     [13] http://www.w3.org/mid/45C932DE.6030109@ibiblio.org
     [14] http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec
     [15] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc29/primer.html
     [16] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc43/scenario-gallery.htm
     [17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues#utf7Encoding-55
     [18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#IRIEverywhere-27
     [19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#xmlChunk-44
     [20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/tag-weekly
     [21] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2007/01/23-tagmem-minutes#action06
     [22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#xmlChunk-44
     [23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Jun/0026.html
     [24] http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions/


    Stuart Williams for TAG
    $Revision: 1.1 $ of $Date: 2007/02/09 17:08:37 $

Received on Friday, 9 February 2007 17:27:19 UTC