- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 00:47:42 -0400
- To: "Rhys Lewis" <rhys@volantis.com>
- Cc: www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Message-Id: <A62333BC-4133-4920-83C0-9929A0A2C6EE@gmail.com>
Hello Rhys, The problem I have always had is knowing what the conditions are for two representations to be of the same resource (and are the resources information entities, or only the representations? - can I content negotiate for the jpeg "representation" of a person?) Using translations as an example is particularly problematic, as most language translations are not exact because there are inevitably cultural attachments to the words that can not be easily understood by non-native speakers. I can understand some much more constrained than what I perceive to be extremely loose language the AWWW, and this document as well, use. For instance we could say that two representations are of the same resource if there is a documented algorithm implementable by a computer that losslessly transforms one into the other, as with a byte sequence and its gzip compressed version. My worry has been that unless there is some way for someone to say: "No, you are wrong, these two things are *not* representations of the the same thing" then the term "representation" is meaningless. Regards, Alan On Aug 23, 2007, at 3:00 AM, Rhys Lewis wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Could I just take a moment to thank Roy and David for their > extensive comments on the latest draft. They provide excellent > input for the forthcoming TAG face to face meeting next month. > > I hope to make progress on specific points before that meeting. If > so, I'll respond here on particular topics. > > Thanks again > > Best wishes > > Rhys
Received on Friday, 24 August 2007 04:47:46 UTC