W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2006

Should XBL2 have a Media Type registered?

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 09:11:20 -0400
Message-Id: <FDBE85B0-AB97-4E16-B372-652D062A85D1@nokia.com>
To: www-tag@w3.org

Hi All,

We have been having an interesting discussion on the public- 
appformats mail list regarding whether or not a Media Type should be  
registered for the XBL2 spec [XBL2]. The head of the discussion is at  

Mark Nottingham suggested in [MN] that we move this discussion to the  
www-tag mail list.

There are a number of relevant documents on this general issue  
including: the [TAG-MIME] finding that includes benefits of using  
Media Types; the [REGISTER] doc that includes instructions for how to  
register a media type; the [TAG-METADATA] finding that includes some  
relevant Best Practices.

Process-wise, I am interested in: a) the precedence here wrt  
registering versus not registering Media Types for formats defined by  
the W3C; and b) some specific guidelines/criteria we can follow.

In general, the above docs (particularly [TAG-MD]) describe the  
benefits of Media Type thus to a certain extent I think the task at  
hand is for the opponents of a Media Type for XBL2 to clearly  
articulate their rationale for opposing the registration.


Art Barstow

[XBL2] <http://www.w3.org/TR/xbl/>
[HEAD] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Sep/ 
[MN] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2006Sep/ 
[TAG-MIME] <http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/0430-mime>
[REGISTER] <http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype>
[TAG-METADATA] <http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mime-respect-20060412>
Received on Friday, 8 September 2006 13:13:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:13 UTC