- From: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 12:59:44 +1000
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-Id: <7081D90E-E8B0-4826-B6F8-370B015E2BC4@nicta.com.au>
According to the guidelines in [1]: "Resource metadata that will change SHOULD NOT be encoded in a URI" "URIs intended for direct use by people should be easy to understand, and should be suggestive of the resource actually named" My question then, as an example, if you look at the URI in [1] with the 2001 date in it - does this mean that the resource in question was written on 2001? Cheers... Renato Iannella National ICT Australia (NICTA) [1] <http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/metaDataInURI-31.html> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain legally privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy, use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus, data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised amendment. This notice should not be removed.
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2006 03:00:01 UTC