- From: Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:37:28 -0500
- To: <www-tag@w3.org>
/ Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel@gmail.com> was heard to say: | The list newbie in me is curious; why not go ahead and simplify it and | instead fully define it to *include* white space inside tags and | quotes around attributes? It would make comparisons of output between | different parsers easier. > >Because there's no where in any of the common models to store that >information. It's always been regarded as insignificant (as has attribute >order and a few other things). You simply can't distinguish between <span >class="foo"></span> and <span class='foo' ></span>. Ah, that's right, now I remember. Back a few years ago when I was pulling my own teeth dealing with the lack of that information in the XML DOM. It was a very unfortunate decision not to include them, IMO. :( >> I wonder if John reads this list. John? My guess is that it has to do with >> rules that XHTML imposes but that aren't easy to deduce from a random >> stream of tags, but I could be wrong. My point was more that, if it was being proposed as a solution, then it would need to actually be the answer and not just an approximation, that was all. >> Download a Java VM and you should be able to run the TagSoup jar >> without any trouble. You can get a VM from ... Thanks. Here-to-fore, my world has been Windows, SQL Server, ASP, VBScript, ASP.NET, VB.NET, et. al. (and many things prior to those...) Mind if I bug you directly if I can't figure out how to get it going (when I finally get around to trying it. So many spinning plates... :) -Mike Schinkel http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/ http://www.welldesignedurls.org/
Received on Friday, 3 November 2006 13:37:56 UTC