- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:36:27 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
Dan Connolly writes: > -- A Web Address for a Phone Number? Do .Tel > By Ben Charny > May 15, 2006 > http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1962924,00.asp > > Sigh... why not tel.hertz.com? Indeed, or why not: application/telephoneNumber+xml? That way I don't need to bury in any aspect of the URI the nature of the resource, but can return a phone number as the reprsentation for anything that's reasonably represented by a phone number. I'm probably missing some history that leads one to want to put this in the name in a standard way, but the rationale isn't clear to me. Seems pretty close to insiting on naming JPEG files with URIs that have a .jpeg suffix. In fact, a Web services bigot might say: why not application/soap+xml, with the returned envelope: <s:envelope> ...header here can put dsig to crosscheck the phone number... ...header here can encrypt the phone number.. <s:body xmlns:t="...."> <t:telephoneNumber>1234567<t:telephoneNumber> </s:body> </s:envelope> Overall I'm suggesting that the fact that it's a phone number be encoded in the returned representation, and not (at least not in a standard idiom) in the URI. -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 --------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2006 21:36:47 UTC