- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:02:38 +0200
- To: www-tag@w3.org
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:25:48 +0200, <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> wrote: > I suspect there may be some pre-W3C history to this, but the choice > doesn't seem consistent with the TAG's emerging consensus that providing > retrievable representations for namespaces is a good thing [2]. Anyone > know more about this and/or have an opinion as to whether the TAG should > comment on this draft? Thanks. Does that really matter for pre-CR drafts? The plan is to eventually move to something like http://www.w3.org/2006/xbl as I understand it. Not sure what the status is with respect to requesting a particular namespace URI. If the TAG thinks it has comments besides this, imho, minor issue I suppose they should raise them, yes. > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xbl-20060619/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/nsDocuments/ -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 28 June 2006 21:02:47 UTC