- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:24:52 -0700
- To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, <Vincent.Quint@inrialpes.fr>
- Cc: <Vincent.Quint@inrialpes.fr>, <www-tag@w3.org>
This whole note is exceeeeeeeedingly ironic. We have regularly had problems getting the right version of the versioning finding from URI datespace. I *WAS* thinking of trying to come up with a very funny response somehow relating the version of the document and the uri to the fact that the newer version removed more of the "xml-centric" nature, but I couldn't quite connect the dots. Cheers, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of > noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 12:47 PM > To: Vincent.Quint@inrialpes.fr > Cc: Vincent.Quint@inrialpes.fr; www-tag@w3.org > Subject: Re: Agenda of 18 July 2006 TAG teleconference > > > I note that the agenda links the new draft on versioning as > "http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/versioning-20060710". In Firefox, at > least, that gets you the XML with no stylesheet. The non dated version at > [1] does work, and at least for the moment does indeed resolve to the July > 10 draft. Looks to me like this is a case where our draft finding on > versioning might benefit from adherence to the advice in Raman's draft > finding on generic resources [2] (which, ahem, also does not seem to have > a stable link for the dated copy :-( ). > > Noah > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/versioning.html > [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/alternatives-discovery.html > > -------------------------------------- > Noah Mendelsohn > IBM Corporation > One Rogers Street > Cambridge, MA 02142 > 1-617-693-4036 > -------------------------------------- > > > >
Received on Monday, 17 July 2006 20:25:36 UTC