Dan Connolly wrote: > On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 15:52 -0500, Elliotte Harold wrote: > [...] > >>Bottom line: the reader of a document is ultimately responsible for >>understanding the document. Different readers will understand different >>things. > > > In extreme cases, yes; but mostly, they'll understand the same > thing; that's where the web gets its value. It facilitates > shared understanding by providing mechanisms to bind (relatively) small > symbols like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BAR_Camp to interesting and > useful meanings. For XML documents: isn't this why we have the application/xml+ range of mimetypes? cheers BillReceived on Wednesday, 4 January 2006 02:59:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:10 UTC