On 10/18/05, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote: > In any case, the point I was making on the call is that the source > of the background information about this case is not reliable > and that the W3C should get the actual facts straight before > making an issue out of it. I have no idea what those facts may be > and am not comfortable with advocacy based on speculation. I think this is the wise course of action. I am glad the TAG is investigating. My post was simply intended to help the TAG gather some of those facts. It would be especially depressing if this guy got a criminial conviction for what appears to be a bug in Safari and an overeaction by a web admin and the courts. Perhaps this is not the case, but it seems plausible and worth looking into. Tyler -- The web-calculus is the union of REST and capability-based security: http://www.waterken.com/dev/Web/ Name your trusted sites to distinguish them from phishing sites. https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=957Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2005 05:57:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:09 UTC