- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:11:39 -0500
- To: "noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: uri@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2005 06:11:52 UTC
On 11/28/05, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > So, HTTP Upgrade seems to make sense only if the Video protocol is going > to use the same transport-layer connection. Interesting question: should > the application invoking HTTP know or care what connection(s) the Video > protocol might use? Yes, I think so. If VIDEO required, say, two UDP streams instead of a single TCP connection, then the client shouldn't use Upgrade to negotiate for its use. Likewise for a P2P protocol? Why indeed should the > application know how how many transport-layer connections HTTP is using? So that it can use Upgrade? 1/2 8-) Mark -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.com
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2005 06:11:52 UTC