Re: Revisiting namespaceDocument-8

* Jonathan Borden wrote:
>>It seems
>>
>>  http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.rddl.org/
>>  http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.rddl.org/rddl2.html
>>
>>both documents are not standards-compliant. Could this be fixed please?
>
>What standard doesn't it comply to?

I suspect it does not comply with the set of standards that define legal
content for use with the text/html media type. RFC 2854 does not seem to
mention RDDL but notes that text/html is defined by W3C Recommendations;
is there some W3C Recommendations that allows use of the text/html media
type for RDDL?
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2005 22:35:08 UTC