- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:34:57 +0200
- To: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
* Jonathan Borden wrote: >>It seems >> >> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.rddl.org/ >> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.rddl.org/rddl2.html >> >>both documents are not standards-compliant. Could this be fixed please? > >What standard doesn't it comply to? I suspect it does not comply with the set of standards that define legal content for use with the text/html media type. RFC 2854 does not seem to mention RDDL but notes that text/html is defined by W3C Recommendations; is there some W3C Recommendations that allows use of the text/html media type for RDDL? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2005 22:35:08 UTC