- From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:08:49 -0400
- To: "'Bjoern Hoehrmann'" <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: --- It seems http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.rddl.org/ http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.rddl.org/rddl2.html both documents are not standards-compliant. Could this be fixed please? -- What standard doesn't it comply to? RDDL 1.0 was never intended to be HTML 4.0 of any flavor. RDDL (1.0) validates against the specified <!DOCTYPE> decl (that can be uncommented out) which is an XHTML Modularization. i.e. <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//XML-DEV//DTD XHTML RDDL 1.0//EN" "http://www.rddl.org/rddl-xhtml.dtd"> The <!DOCTYPE decl was commented out because XHTML Modularization caused whatever version of IE to hang at the time. It validates using the Brown validator BTW. Jonathan
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2005 22:08:58 UTC