- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:50:49 -0600
- To: "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>
- Cc: David Orchard <David.Orchard@BEA.com>, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, www-tag@w3.org
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 18:09 +0000, Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) wrote: > Hello Dan, > > > I note "It is heavily XML schema based, but only because of > > scheduling. > > OWL/RDF and RelaxNG sections wil be added" which makes me > > think perhaps I should have waited until those sections were > > added to commit to a review. But pressing on... > > I'm wonder whether the application of E&V principles to OWL/RDF falls > within the scope of the Semantic Web Best Practices WG. Yes, they have a "vocabulary management" task force. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/ So there's some overlap, just like with the XML Schema WG, etc. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 24 January 2005 19:50:50 UTC