- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:00:43 -0500
- To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
In case it's of interest, I thought I'd point out that the Web Architecture Recommendation has a brief section on comparison of URIs [1]. It refers also to section 6 of rfc2396bis [2]. Nothing in these should be surprising to anyone who's followed the debates on URI comparisons, but it's probably worth consulting both before making any firm design decisions for WS-Addressing. Thanks. Noah [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#identifiers-comparison [2] http://gbiv.com/protocols/uri/rev-2002/draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-07.html#comparison -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 -------------------------------------- "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> Sent by: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org 01/14/05 04:31 PM To: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org> cc: (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM) Subject: NEW ISSUE: Comparison of URIs used as identifiers. Several of the URIs defined by WS-Addressing are used primarily for identification rather than primarily dereferencing: [message id], [relationship], and [action]. In other specifications, how to compare values of these properties is usually defined. WS-Addressing would benefit from a section like this as well. I propose we essentially copy the WSDL 2.0 section on this into the WS-A spec: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.html?cont ent-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#uricompare
Received on Friday, 14 January 2005 22:03:12 UTC