W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2005

RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy

From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:01:30 -0500
Message-Id: <200502211501.j1LF1V1T087778@ohcg.spinweb.net>
To: "'David Orchard'" <dorchard@bea.com>, "'Norman Walsh'" <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, <www-tag@w3.org>

FWIW, RDDL v1 (http://www.rddl.org/) was explicitly designed to handle this

You can use the construct:

<div id="v4">
	<rddl:resource ... />
	<rddl:resource ... />
<div id="v5">
	<rddl:resource ... />
	<rddl:resource ... />

To create labelled "containers" of resources.

For example look at <div id="RELAXNG"> ... </div> which "contains" all of
the RELAXNG modules. Similarly a <div> could "contain" all of a version
specific list of resources.


David Orchard wrote:

I've been thinking about the relationship of namespaces to version
identifiers for a while.  Perhaps the version attribute could be relative
and then appended to the ns uri, ie ns#version=5 or
ns#version/5 or ns/version/5?

Received on Monday, 21 February 2005 15:01:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:07 UTC