- From: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:47:12 -0800
- To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, <www-tag@w3.org>
I guess 'breakage' is the wrong word. On our platforms they can't use xml:base or xml:id. Although this leads to customer complaints it isn't breakage since they weren't scenarios that used to work that don't anymore. -- PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM There is always one more bug. -----Original Message----- From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 2:04 PM To: www-tag@w3.org Subject: Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy I'm sorry, Dare, did you hit 'send' too soon, or are you saying that you think the fact that you have to declare them is what's going to cause applications to break? If so, (1) I don't see how and (2) it's no different than xml:lang or xml:space, do you content that they cause breakage too for the same reason? Be seeing you, norm -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc. NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2005 22:47:16 UTC