- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:03:54 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87bralscol.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com> was heard to say: |> -----Original Message----- |> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] |> On Behalf Of Norman Walsh |> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 1:35 PM |> To: www-tag@w3.org |> Subject: Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning |> and Policy |> |> |> 2. If your application requires validity, nothing breaks. You |> can't use |> xml:id attributes unless you put them in your schema and if you put |> them in your schema, they'll work just like any other attributes I'm sorry, Dare, did you hit 'send' too soon, or are you saying that you think the fact that you have to declare them is what's going to cause applications to break? If so, (1) I don't see how and (2) it's no different than xml:lang or xml:space, do you content that they cause breakage too for the same reason? Be seeing you, norm -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc. NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2005 22:35:04 UTC