- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:28:04 -0800
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20050209222804.GA20383@ridley.dbaron.org>
On Wednesday 2005-02-09 15:28 -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: > Beyond the particular issues of xml:id, the Core WG and the XML CG > look to the TAG to provide some architectural guidance for the > maintainance of namespaces in general. Can a working group define > previously undefined names in a namespace, or is a namespace, once > published, a closed, immutable set? A number of standards that depend on markup languages (e.g., CSS selectors, XPath, DOM) have been designed around the assumption that not only *may* a working group define previously undefined names, but it *should* do so rather than copying existing element semantics into a new namespace. (Perhaps saying that they're designed around that assumption is a little strong. But their usability certainly depends on that assumption.) In particular, neither CSS selectors nor XPath provide a mechanism for easily matching semantically-identical elements in multiple namespaces. They require spelling the whole thing out, which would make things very difficult for authors once multiple versions are present. It's quite painful for authors to have to write things like: [selectors] svg10|text, svg11|text, svg12|text [XPath] svg10:text or svg11:text or svg12:text or, even worse: [selectors] svg10|g svg10|text, svg10|g svg11|text, svg10|g svg11|text, svg11|g svg10|text, svg11|g svg11|text, svg11|g svg11|text, svg12|g svg10|text, svg12|g svg11|text, svg12|g svg11|text, [Xpath] *[(self::svg10:g or self::svg11:g or self::svg12:g)]// *[(self::svg10:text or self::svg11:text or self::svg12:text)] (I'm not much of an XPath expert; there may be a better way of doing that.) Similar problems exist for a some methods in DOM APIs, such as Node::getElementsByTagNameNS. And similar problems certainly exist within many users of DOM APIs, since using the DOM APIs to answer questions such as "Is this element and SVG g element?" becomes much harder. Code that uses DOM APIs to answer this type of question would become much more complicated given separate namespaces for each version. -David -- L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ >
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2005 22:28:45 UTC