W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2005

Fwd: Re: Registration of media type image/svg+xml

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:52:47 +0100
Message-ID: <1037429581.20051216115247@w3.org>
To: www-tag@w3.org

This is a forwarded message
From: MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Friday, December 16, 2005, 2:26:53 AM
Subject: Registration of media type image/svg+xml

===8<==============Original message text===============
Chris>    Optional parameters:
Chris>           None
Chris> 
Chris>           The encoding of an SVG document shall be determined by the
Chris>           XML encoding declaration. This has identical semantics to the
Chris>           application/xml media type in the case where the charset
Chris>           parameter is omitted, as specified in RFC3023 sections
Chris>           8.9, 8.10 and 8.11.


The W3C TAG finding "Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use" 
says:
	We recommend that section 7.1 of [RFC3023] be amended to something like the following:

	The use of the charset parameter, when the charset is reliably
	known and agrees with the encoding declaration, is RECOMMENDED,
	since this information can be used by non-XML processors to
	determine authoritatively the charset of the XML MIME entity.

Chris is behind this TAG finding, and I agree.  Chris and I are
co-editors for RFC 3023 bis.  So, why does thie media type omit 
the charset param?  I think that it makes a lot of sense to do 
exactly what the W3C TAG finding says.

Cheers,

-- 
MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>


===8<===========End of original message text===========



-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Friday, 16 December 2005 10:53:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:10 UTC