W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2005

purl.org to and HTTP 302 vs 303 [httpRange-14]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:33:31 -0600
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1134599611.21371.67.camel@dirk>

I just found this message from July...
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Jul/0012.html

I don't see that it's been answered.

The TAG's decision says...
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Jun/0039.html

[[
 b) If an "http" resource responds to a GET request with a

      303 (See Other) response, then the resource identified
      by that URI could be any resource;

]]

but purl.org uses 302. Is that close enough?

I suspect not, but danbri's message has some stuff from
the HTTP spec that might show that it is.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2005 22:35:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:10 UTC