- From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 20:45:14 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
On Apr 15, 2005, at 12:51 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: >> >> One thing I didn't get to do in time for this round was make it a >> proper RDDL document. There's some irony in that, to be sure, but I'm >> not sure what the nature and purpose URIs should be for function >> definitions anyway. > > (double-checking... http://www.rddl.org/#nature is like rdf:type > and each purpose is like an RDF property... ok...) > > I think a/the nature (i.e. rdf:type) of an XQuery function > is owl:FunctionalProperty. > > I can't think of any relevant uses of rddl:purpose. > Interesting ... it seems to me that the definition of a function is when one's nature and purpose are the same thing e.g. xquery:function where xquery:function rdfs:subClassOf owl:FunctionalProperty. Jonathan
Received on Saturday, 16 April 2005 00:45:19 UTC