Re: new issue? squatting on link relationship names, x-tokens, registries, and URI-based extensibility from Henry S. Thompson on 2005-04-12 (www-tag@w3.org from April 2005)

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:39:12 +0100
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5by8bowczj.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> writes:

> Atom does take an interesting approach WRT what you discuss below; the
> content of @rel can have two syntactic forms; it can either be an
> absolute URI, or it can be a token which is treated as a URI-reference
> with a fixed base (that of the IANA registry for that token
> namespace).

Could you expand just a bit -- "token namespace"?  Where is that
declared/bound/found. . .?

ht
-- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2005 09:39:22 UTC