- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:01:25 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-id: <87acoatw2y.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Hi Len, Just a couple of points of clarification. / "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com> was heard to say: | The FastInfoset approach has been privately benchmarked and proven The benchmarks are public, not private. See the section "Performance Reports" on https://fi.dev.java.net/ | to be workable in much the same way as the cases given above. Since | faster performance is a customer requirement and not a theoretical | issue, customers can go to the innovators who provide the necessary | technology. | | That would be, in this case, Sun. The Fast Infoset specification, ITU-T Rec. X.891 | ISO/IEC 24824-1 (Fast Infoset), is being standardized at the ITU-T and ISO. | They are of course, possibly willing | to license that technology to their partner in Redmond which has | slower and late to market technology to assist them in coming to market. There is no need to license anything from Sun (or anybody else) to implement FI. The standard is totally RF. Additionally, you can get an open source (ASL 2.0) licensed product-quality implementation at https://fi.dev.java.net/ Be seeing you, norm -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc. NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2005 16:01:34 UTC