- From: Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) <skw@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:02:32 +0100
- To: <www-tag@w3.org>
The agenda for the TAG telcon on 25th October can be found at:
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/10/25-tag
and is included in text below.
Best regards
Stuart Williams
--
========================================================================
==
Agenda of 25th October 2004 TAG teleconference
Nearby: [3]Teleconference details - [4]issues list ([5]handling new
issues) - [6]www-tag archive
[3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#remote
[4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html
[5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Jul/0054.html
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/
1. Administrative (15 mins)
1. Roll call. Regrets: None
Scribe: Chris Lilley volunteered for this meeting.
2. Meeting Records
1. Accept minutes of [7]18th October telcon(see [8]attachment)
3. Accept this [9]agenda?
4. TAG Summaries
Review of Monthy Summary Report
From 5-7th Oct F2F :Paul volunteered to do the next monthly
report
and noted that the AC report is cumulative of the previous three
reports.
+ ACTION PC: create draft summary for AC, get it to Steve
Bratt
by Oct 22
+ ACTION TBL: to investigate possible staff contact for TAG,
due date 20 October 2004
[will add pointers when available]
5. Date of next meeting: propose Monday 1 November 2004
Appoint scribe for next meeting.
[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Oct/0111.html
[8]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Oct/att-0111/_tag.html
[9] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/10/18-tag.html
1.1 Technical Plenary
1. Observers - see [10]email from Dan (member visible)
2. TAG Requested Liasons?
[10] http://www.w3.org/mid/1098221958.30433.1042.camel@dirk
1.2 TAG Charter
1. Brief reminder that TAG feedback has been [11]requested from TAG
by 25 Oct (i.e.. today).
[11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2004Oct/0027.html
2. Technical (75 min)
See also [12]open actions by owner and [13]open issues.
[12] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/actions_owner.html
[13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?view=normal&closed=1
2.1 Review of 2nd Last Call Document (30-45mins)
1. Report from the Editor:
+ ACTION: NDW to fix "One particularly useful mapping in the
case of flat namespaces (specified, for example, in
[RDFXML])
is to combine the namespace URI, a hash ("#"), and the local
name, thus creating a URI for a secondary resource (the
identified term)."
+ ACTION: NDW to fix "relevant specifications", incorporating
a
cross-reference to 3.1.1 Details of retrieving a
representation.
+ ACTION: NDW to attempt to incorporate input from NM and RF
etc. on generalizing representations.
2. Generalised Representations
+ Need to decide whether this is a direction we want to take
(for this edition of Webarch).
3. Publication Schedule
+ PR Planning ([14]email from DanC) (member visible)
ACTION DC: draft a request for proposed recommendation,
based
on Norm's draft.
+ Open Threads (see below)
+ Decisions and/orRevise Plan? (from [15]F2F?)
ACTION CL: to cause draft of press release to happen
4. [16]LC#2 Status Open Threads
+ Use of "assign" for URI -> resource
o [17]...
o [18]2004-10-11T15:39:27Z from skw
o [19]2004-10-11T16:59:53Z from LMM
ACTION: SW to Close that thread Use of "assign" for URI
-> resource
o [20]2004-10-15T19:34:49Z from connolly
+ Representation of a secondary resource?
o [21]2004-09-21T15:54:05Z from jacek.kopecky
Done ACTION: DC to to reply to commenter re primary and
secondary resources. CONTINUES. with apologies
o [22]2004-10-20T13:25:40Z from connolly
o [23]2004-10-20T14:50:03Z from jacek.kopecky
+ KD005 thru KD016: Comments on Web Arch WD - 2004-07-05
(see separate threads for each - how many can be closed?
it may be useful to visit [24]KD007, [25]KD011 and
KD[26]014/[27]015)
+ HTML WG last call comment on
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-webarch-20040816/
o [28]...
Done ACTION: SW to update HTML WG on specific text re
xlink
o [29]2004-10-19T13:20:54Z from skw
o [30]2004-10-20T15:41:07Z from steven.pemberton
o [31]2004-10-20T16:27:08Z from connolly
+ non-authoritative syntaxes for fragment identifiers
o [32]...
o [33]2004-09-27T23:38:25Z from myriam.amielh
o ACTION: RF to reply [closed] and pls fwd your question
to www-tag for discussion re non-authoritative syntaxes
for fragment identifier
Any other open threads that we can usefully discuss (proposals
can
be added to the agenda).
[14] http://www.w3.org/mid/1098389031.14529.340.camel@dirk
[15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/10/05-07-tag.html#plan234
[16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004lc/lc-status-report.html
[17] http://www.w3.org/mid/416AA92F.1020707@hp.com
[18] http://www.w3.org/mid/416AA92F.1020707@hp.com
[19] http://www.w3.org/mid/0I5F00H5GJ7TZJ@mailsj-v1.corp.adobe.com
[20] http://www.w3.org/mid/1097868888.30433.533.camel@dirk
[21] http://www.w3.org/mid/1095782045.2943.125.camel@Kalb
[22] http://www.w3.org/mid/1098278739.30433.1133.camel@dirk
[23] http://www.w3.org/mid/1098283803.3024.80.camel@Kalb
[24]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004OctDec/0
095.html
[25]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004OctDec/0
089.html
[26]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004OctDec/0
094.html
[27]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004OctDec/0
066.html
[28] http://www.w3.org/mid/417514B6.80204@hp.com
[29] http://www.w3.org/mid/417514B6.80204@hp.com
[30] http://www.w3.org/mid/opsf6dutlgsmjzpq@viao-1.lan
[31] http://www.w3.org/mid/1098289628.14529.186.camel@dirk
[32] http://www.w3.org/mid/4158A471.5000304@cisra.canon.com.au
[33] http://www.w3.org/mid/4158A471.5000304@cisra.canon.com.au
Resources
1. [34]1st Last Call issues list ([35]sorted by section)
2. [36]1st Last Call Annotated version of WebArch
3. [37]List of actions by TAG participant
4. [38]2nd Last Call WD
5. Archive of [39]public-webarch-comment
6. [40]2nd Last Call Comments Tracking page
[34] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/issues.html
[35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/concerning.html
[36] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/webarchWithIssues.html
[37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/actions_owner.html
[38] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-webarch-20040816/
[39] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/
[40] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004lc/lc-status-report.html
2.2 Continue review of open issues
Review will continue starting with [41]siteDate-36
[41] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues#siteData-36
2.2.1 status of Action Item status
Report on completed actions.
[42]httpRange-14
ACTION DC: with Norm, develop a finding on httpRange-14
starting with the HashSlashDuality text
[42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues#httpRange-14
[43]fragmentInXML-28
ACTION CONTINUES: Chris: Write up a summary of the
resolution[44]http://www.w3.org/2004/05/14-tag-summary.html#fra
gmentInXML-28
[43] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues#fragmentInXML-28
[44] http://www.w3.org/2004/05/14-tag-summary.html#fragmentInXML-28
[45]xmlProfiles-29
ACTION Norm: Get XML Core WG to take on XMLProfiles-29
[45] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues#xmlProfiles-29
[46]binaryXML-30
ACTION: Norm to add xbc use cases to binaryXML-30
ACTION Chris: Review the connection between the use cases and
the taxomony on Chris's note
[46] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues#binaryXML-30
[47]metadataInURI-31
ACTION Stuart revise finding (well overdue).
ACTION Paul find out what happened to DaveO's action item
there.
[47] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues#metadataInURI-31
[48]mixedUIXMLNamespace-33
ACTION Norm update the issues list to point to "The W3C
Workshop on Web Applications and Compound
Documents[49]http://www.w3.org/2004/04/webapps-cdf-ws/summary"
[48] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues#mixedUIXMLNamespace-33
[49] http://www.w3.org/2004/04/webapps-cdf-ws/summary
[50]xmlFunctions-34
ACTION timbl take another stab at specifying the problem
[50] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues#xmlFunctions-34
[51]XMLVersion-41
ACTION NDW: to report workplan and dates for Extensibilty and
Versioning work..
ACTION PC: solicit QA WG review of draft
extensibility/versioning finding
[51] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues#XMLVersion-41
_________________________________________________________________
The TAG does not expect to discuss issues below this line.
3. Status report on these findings
See also [52]TAG findings
* [53]abstractComponentRefs-37:
+ 30 Oct 2003 draft finding "[54]Abstract Component
References"
* [55]contentPresentation-26:
+ 30 June 2003 draft finding "[56]Separation of semantic and
presentational markup, to the extent possible, is
architecturally sound"
* [57]metadataInURI-31
* [58]siteData-36
+ "[59]There is no such thing as a Web site"
* [60]xmlChunk-44
+ "[61]XML Chunk Equality"
[52] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
[53]
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#abstractComponentRefs-37
[54] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/abstractComponentRefs-20031030
[55]
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentPresentation-26
[56]
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/contentPresentation-26-20030630.html
[57] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31
[58] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#siteData-36
[59] http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/01/08/WebSite36
[60] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#xmlChunk-44
[61] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/xmlChunkEquality.html
_________________________________________________________________
Stuart Williams for TAG
$Revision: 1.4 $ of $Date: 2004/10/22 15:01:42 $
Received on Friday, 22 October 2004 15:03:11 UTC