Re: Towards a position of neutrality on issue httpRange-14 for AWWW

/ Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com was heard to say:
|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: ext Stuart Williams [mailto:skw@hp.com]
[...]
|> I'd like to support the edit you suggest. Norm was actioned to revise 
|> this text to remove an actual error that intimated that RDF actually 
|> introduced '#' during the concatenation process [1]. Your replacement 
|> edit could fall within the scope of that action.
|> 
|> [1] http://www.w3.org/2004/10/18-tagmem-irc#T19-59-57
|
| Great.

This has, in fact, already been completed. It's reflected in the 19
October[1] draft:

  For flat namespaces, concatenation is one useful mapping. If
  namespace URIs that end with a hash (\u201c#\u201d) are chosen, then
  simple concatenation of the namespace URI and the local name creates
  a URI for a secondary resource (the identified term). This technique
  is used for many [RDFXML] namespaces.

  Other mappings are likely to be more suitable for hierarchical
  namespaces; see the related TAG issue abstractComponentRefs-37.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/webarch-20041019/

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.