- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 15:01:12 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF032B0721.991E2C89-ON85256F2D.00631EBE@lotus.com>
At the Basel meeting I raised some concerns that I have had for some time regarding the treatment of resource typing in the architecture document. Specifically, I feel that the existing drafts go a bit too far in implying that representations must in all future protocols be octet streams typed with Internet Media types. I was assigned an action which is paraphrased in the minutes as [1]: ACTION NM: to take a run through to see how generalizing 'representation' to be less constrained would look with more careful terminology, report on whether this looks feasible or not. For those not at our meeting, the intention was that I would fork a private copy of the document and edit it to show proposed changes. This note fulfulls that action; a revised draft is attached. This draft has no official status except that the TAG has committed to take a look and evaluate whether the changes would be (a) desirable on the merits and (b) sufficiently low risk given our publication schedule. Having approached this exercise with some hesitancy I can say I am reasonably pleased by the result; I hope the TAG will adopt something close to this. To my biased eye, the changes are subtle but important architecturally, and are complementary to both the flow and the intentions of the original. I believe they strike a good balance in emphasizing the use of HTTP, octet streams and Internet media types as near universal current practice, encouraging their continued use in the future, yet allowing for the possibility that new protocols or a need to deal with the known shortcomings of RFC 2046 may someday present a legitimate requirement for other forms of representation or a different typing mechanism. I believe it's important that the Web architecture anticipate these possibilities, and I hope this draft shows that the needed changes are both tractable and desirable. In any case, I am grateful to the TAG for any consideration given at this late stage in the development of the architecture document. Packaging of the attached files ------------------------------- The files are provided in a .zip archive. Unzip to any folder and launch the html file. I'm sure there are a few loose ends editorially, but the essence of the changes should be clear. All significant changes are highlighted in color and also set off with markers of the form [{NOAH>} ..new text here.. {<NOAH}]. Searching for the string "NOAH" should get you to all significant changes. Private copies of the usual stylesheets and .png files are provided, but are not modified from the official versiosn on w3c servers; they are provided only so that the existing relative links will resolve. One additional stylesheet and associated link has been added to define the highlighting of insertions and deletions made for this experimental branch. Those involved in maintaining editors' drafts should know that I did not re-run the autogenerators for TOCs, etc., but rather edited everything by hand, in part to preserve change highlighting. We can integrate properly if the changes are adopted. Thank you! Noah P.S. To TAG members: I would be delighted if these changes were discussed on the Monday call, but please recall that I am scheduled to get off an airplane an hour ahead of the call and there is some chance that I will either be late or completely absent. Assuming the flight is on time, I'm optimistic about making at least the latter half. Thank you. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Oct/0035.html -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 --------------------------------------
Attachments
- application/zip attachment: ArchdocNoahMediaTypeRevs.zip
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2004 19:03:58 UTC