- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 15:14:30 +0200
- To: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>, <chris@w3.org>
On Oct 7, 2004, at 10:10 AM, <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com> wrote: [... skipping over the bits that are not about correctly recording the meeting; I'll reply to those separately under a different subject. ...] > 2. In the discussion regarding Claud Shannon's work, TimBL > states that he uses the term "information resource" in the > same way as Claud Shannon, where? ah... ] Tim: I am using info resource the same way as claude shannon I think that was mis-transcribed. I heard TimBL say he uses the term "information" in the same way Shannon used it. > though in the referenced materials > Claud Shannon appears to only use the term "information source" > (not resource) and I would expect that there is a singificant > distinction there (such that if the distinction is lost, much > confusion could arise). Every source may be a kind of resource, > but not every resource may be a kind of source. -- Dan
Received on Thursday, 7 October 2004 14:15:40 UTC