- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 19:42:23 -0800
- To: www-tag@w3.org, "w3. org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Which is the correct mailing list to discuss the 3023 revision? I just got around to reading http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-murata-kohn-lilley-xml-00.txt (from last July) and was fairly astounded at section 5, saying that use of "+xml" in a media type implies a commitment to support XPointer. Questions: Are there any "+xml" media type for which this is not the case? Is it the case that if a +xml media type doesn't specify a #fragid semantic, RFC3023bis normatively creates one? Strong stuff.... -Tim
Received on Sunday, 21 November 2004 03:42:26 UTC