RFC3023 question

Which is the correct mailing list to discuss the 3023 revision?

I just got around to reading 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-murata-kohn-lilley-xml-00.txt 
(from last July) and was fairly astounded at section 5, saying that use 
of "+xml" in a media type implies a commitment to support XPointer.

Questions:
Are there any "+xml" media type for which this is not the case?
Is it the case that if a +xml media type doesn't specify a #fragid 
semantic, RFC3023bis normatively creates one?

Strong stuff.... -Tim

Received on Sunday, 21 November 2004 03:42:26 UTC