- From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:38:58 +0900
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Cc: MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
Noah Mendelsohn writes: > Chris Lilley writes: > > > - xml 1.1 or 1.0 (soap 10 only as schema is 1.0 only) > > unclear areas > > Having missed this week's call, I'm not really sure what the context is > for this discussion of 3023. I did some coordination months ago with > Murata-san as to treatment of xml 1.0 and xml 1.1 in 3023, and I believe > the resolution we agreed was workable for SOAP 1.2. I have not checked > lately whether that resolution is in fact reflected in latest 3023 drafts, > and given that I'm on an airplane at the moment I can't check just now. Is > this something on which I need to follow up for Tag purposes? Presumably > XMLP can take a first cut at any issues relating directly to SOAP. I'm > cc:'ing David Fallside, XMLP chair, to keep him in the loop. Thanks. The draft I sent to Chris Lilley and Dan Kohn on October 6 says: 7. XML Versions application/xml, application/xml-external-parsed-entity, and application/xml-dtd, text/xml(deprecated) and text/xml-external-parsed-entity(deprecated) are to be used with [XML] and [XML1.1]. In all examples herein where version="1.0" is shown, it is understood that version="1.1" may also be used, providing the content does indeed conform to [XML1.1]. Specifications and recommendations based on or referring to this RFC SHOULD indicate any limitations on the particular versions of XML to be used. For example, a particular specification might indicate: "content MUST be represented using media-type application/xml, and the document must either (a) carry an xml declaration specifying version="1.0" or (b) omit the XML declaration, in which case per the XML recommendation the version defaults to 1.0" Is this good enough? > Noah However, this interim draft has not been published yet. To keep the ball rolling, I am going to submit this I-D soon. Cheers, -- MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>
Received on Thursday, 11 November 2004 10:39:34 UTC