RE: WSDL describing Interface operation safety

David and WSD-WG,

Thank you for the update and for respodning to our issue.  The TAG discussed
this on 26th April [1] and actioned me to respond on its behalf.

The TAG is generally pleased with the direction the WSD WG has taken.
However, it wants continue to track this issue through actual deployment and
use of the property. 

We have a small concern about the potential for marking an unsafe operation
as safe, and we would like to encourage the WG to provide some discussion of
potential mis-uses (accidental or malicious). We would also like to
encourage that examples of correct and incorrect use of the property be
included in any test-suites the WG may be working on.

Best regards

Stuart Williams
On Behalf of W3C TAG
[1] http://www.w3.org/2004/04/26-tag-summary.html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] 
> On Behalf Of David Orchard
> Sent: 7 April 2004 21:22
> To: www-tag@w3.org
> Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: WSDL describing Interface operation safety
> 
> 
> Dear TAG,
> 
> On behalf of the WSD Working Group, I would like to inform 
> you of the WSD WGs decision regarding description of safety 
> of operations, part of TAG issue 7.  
> 
> The recently published WSDL 2.0 Part 1: Core WD provides a 
> property called "safety" on interface operations [1].  With 
> this, we believe that we have delivered an appropriate 
> solution to the request to describe the safety of operations.
> 
> We welcome any questions, concerns, or comments regarding the 
> wsdl 2.0 description of safety of operations, including 
> support for our solution.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dave Orchard
> On behalf of the WSD WG.
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20/#InterfaceOperation
>

Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2004 04:19:23 UTC