Re: Reviewed charmod fundamentals

On Sunday, March 21, 2004, 3:28:55 PM, Martin wrote:

MD> At 11:47 04/03/06 +0100, Chris Lilley wrote:

>>On Friday, March 5, 2004, 11:03:23 PM, Tim wrote:
>>TB> Per my action item, I reviewed the charmod fundamentals doc, at

>>TB> Er, can this doc go to recommendation with IRIs still uncooked?
>>Well, its not going to Rec right now. Its a WD, and going to Last
>>Call will be the next step,

MD> Sorry, but the Character Model *is* currently in Last Call.

Yes, of course it is, thats why we are reviewing it. Duh. No idea why
I said that.

>>then CR.
>>WebArch was able to go to last call with 2396bis 'uncooked', referring
>>to an Internet Draft rather than a standards track RFC because we
>>preferred it;i see no reason that Charmod can't do the same.

MD> Yes, in particular because IRI moving forward depends on 2396bis moving
MD> forward, as we have already told the TAG in a last call comment on WebArch.


 Chris Lilley          
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 Member, W3C Technical Architecture Group

Received on Sunday, 21 March 2004 14:43:02 UTC