Re: Reviewed charmod fundamentals

At 11:47 04/03/06 +0100, Chris Lilley wrote:

>On Friday, March 5, 2004, 11:03:23 PM, Tim wrote:
>TB> Per my action item, I reviewed the charmod fundamentals doc, at

>TB> Er, can this doc go to recommendation with IRIs still uncooked?
>Well, its not going to Rec right now. Its a WD, and going to Last
>Call will be the next step,

Sorry, but the Character Model *is* currently in Last Call.

>then CR.
>WebArch was able to go to last call with 2396bis 'uncooked', referring
>to an Internet Draft rather than a standards track RFC because we
>preferred it;i see no reason that Charmod can't do the same.

Yes, in particular because IRI moving forward depends on 2396bis moving
forward, as we have already told the TAG in a last call comment on WebArch.

Regards,    Martin.

Received on Sunday, 21 March 2004 09:29:12 UTC