- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 09:28:55 -0500
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org <www-tag@w3.org>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
At 11:47 04/03/06 +0100, Chris Lilley wrote: >On Friday, March 5, 2004, 11:03:23 PM, Tim wrote: > >TB> Per my action item, I reviewed the charmod fundamentals doc, at > >TB> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-charmod-20040225 >TB> Er, can this doc go to recommendation with IRIs still uncooked? > >Well, its not going to Rec right now. Its a WD, and going to Last >Call will be the next step, Sorry, but the Character Model *is* currently in Last Call. >then CR. > >WebArch was able to go to last call with 2396bis 'uncooked', referring >to an Internet Draft rather than a standards track RFC because we >preferred it;i see no reason that Charmod can't do the same. Yes, in particular because IRI moving forward depends on 2396bis moving forward, as we have already told the TAG in a last call comment on WebArch. Regards, Martin.
Received on Sunday, 21 March 2004 09:29:12 UTC