- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:55:49 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1079114149.3081.388.camel@seabright>
Hello, The agenda of the 15 March 2004 TAG teleconference is available as HTML [1] and as text below. _ Ian [1] http://www.w3.org/2004/03/15-tag ======================================================== W3C | [1]TAG | Previous: [2]2 Mar ftf meeting | Next: 22 Mar [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2004/03/02-tag-summary.html Agenda of 15 March 2004 TAG teleconference Nearby: [3]Teleconference details · [4]issues list ([5]handling new issues)· [6]www-tag archive [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#remote [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Jul/0054.html [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/ 1. Administrative (20min) 1. Roll call. Regrets: IJ 2. Proposed to accept minutes of the [7]2 Mar ftf meeting. However, not all of the liaisons minutes are available yet. 3. Accept this [8]agenda? 4. Proposed next meeting: 22 March. 5. FTF meeting in April or May (c.f [9]online form)? [7] http://www.w3.org/2004/03/02-tag-summary.html [8] http://www.w3.org/2004/03/15-tag.html [9] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34270/tagftfmay2004/ 1.1 Review of open action items related to issues The TAG expects to review the list of [10]open actions by owner and to close any that are obvious to close. TAG participants are encouraged to review this list before the meeting, as well as other action items listed in this agenda. [10] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/actions_owner.html 2. Technical (70min) See also [11]open actions by owner and [12]open issues. [11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/actions_owner.html [12] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?view=normal&closed=1 2.1 Formal approval of Qname finding * [13]qnameAsId-18 + 14 Jan 2004 draft finding "[14]Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Content" [13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#qnameAsId-18 [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/qnameids-2004-01-14 At the ftf meeting we did not formally approve NW's finding. Proposed to publish the 14 Jan draft as an approved finding using the usual mechanisms. 2.2 Internationalization Issues 2.2.1 TAG review of "Character Model for the World Wide Web 1.0: Fundamentals" See [15]25 Feb 2004 WD of Charmod Fundamentals * [16]Review by Tim Bray (and following thread) * Relation to [17]charmodReview-17? 1. [18]actions 2. TAG finding related to adoption of Charmod? See [19]mail from TBL [15] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-charmod-20040225/ [16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Mar/0007.html [17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#charmodReview-17 [18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/actions.html#charmodReview-17 [19] http://www.w3.org/mid/361483C6-96E6-11D7-9C47-000393914268@w3.org 2.2.2 Status report regarding TAG's URI/IRI issues * [20]URIEquivalence-15 * [21]IRIEverywhere-27 [20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?view=normal&closed=1#URIEquivalence-15 [21] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#IRIEverwhere-27 2.3 Update on namespaceDocument-8 * [22]namespaceDocument-8 1. Review finding outline from PC 2. Agree to next steps w.r.t. RDDL Note and Finding. [22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#namespaceDocument-8 2.4 Web Architecture Document Last Call Resources: 1. [23]Last Call issues list ([24]sorted by section) 2. [25]Annotated version of WebArch 3. Archive of [26]public-webarch-comments 4. [27]List of actions by TAG participant 5. Additional actions 1. Action IJ 2004/02/09: Incorporate editorial suggestions (see minutes of that meeting for details). [23] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/issues.html [24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/concerning.html [25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/webarchWithIssues.html [26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/ [27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/actions_owner.html _________________________________________________________________ The TAG does not expect to discuss issues below this line. 3. Status report on these findings See also [28]TAG findings * [29]abstractComponentRefs-37: + 30 Oct 2003 draft finding "[30]Abstract Component References" * [31]contentPresentation-26: + 30 June 2003 draft finding "[32]Separation of semantic and presentational markup, to the extent possible, is architecturally sound" * [33]metadataInURI-31 * [34]siteData-36 + "[35]There is no such thing as a Web site" [28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings [29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#abstractComponentRefs-37 [30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/abstractComponentRefs-20031030 [31] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentPresentation-26 [32] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/contentPresentation-26-20030630.html [33] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31 [34] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#siteData-36 [35] http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/01/08/WebSite36 4. Other action items * Action RF 2003/10/08: Explain "identifies" in RFC 2396. * Action DC 2003/11/15: Follow up on KeepPOSTRecords with Janet Daly on how to raise awareness of this point (which is in CUAP). * Action CL 2003/10/27: Draft XML mime type thingy with Murata-san _________________________________________________________________ Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL Last modified: $Date: 2004/03/12 17:54:49 $ -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Friday, 12 March 2004 12:55:51 UTC