[Agenda] 14 June 2004 TAG teleconf (Arch Doc)

Hello,

The agenda of the TAG's 14 June teleconference is
available as HTML [1] and as text below.

 _ Ian

[1] http://www.w3.org/2004/06/14-tag.html

==================================================

                   Agenda of 14 June 2004 TAG teleconference

1. Administrative

    1. Roll call. Regrets: TBL, SW, IJ
    2. Accept the [7]minutes of the 7 June teleconf?
    3. Accepte this [8]agenda?
    4. Next meeting 21 June?
    5. Action TBL 2004/05/12: Talk to TB and DO about editor role.

      [7] http://www.w3.org/2004/06/07-tag-summary.html
      [8] http://www.w3.org/2004/06/14-tag.html

  1.1 Meeting schedule

   Action TAG 2004/06/07: Send summer regrets to TAG list.
    1. Summer meeting schedule? Cancel 5 July?
    2. AC meeting [9]rescheduled for 2-3 December. Does this affect
       whether to hold TAG ftf meeting in November?
    3. Ottawa meeting update?
    4. 5-7 October Basel meeting update?

      [9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2004AprJun/0050.html

  1.3 TAG Charter

   Action IJ 2004/06/07: Report back on next AB meeting to discuss TAG
   charter and relation to patent policy.

2. Technical

   See also [10]open actions by owner and [11]open issues.

     [10] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/actions_owner.html
     [11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?view=normal&closed=1

   Completed action items:
    1. Action IJ 2004/05/24/: Announce the closure of issue
       URIEquivalence-15. See [12]proposal to drop this action.

     [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2004May/0070.html

  2.1 xml11Names-46

    1. Action NW 2004/06/07: Write up [13]XML 1.1 Question for the TAG.
       If there are no objections to formulation, forward to the XML CG
       on behalf of TAG

     [13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004May/0039.html

  2.2 httpRange-14 status

   Action TBL/RF 2004/05/13: Write up a summary position to close
   httpRange-14, text for document.

  2.3 Web Architecture Document Last Call

   See the 8 [14]June 2004 Editor's Draft. Assign reviewers to specific
   sections?
     * Action NW 2004/05/14: Propose text on tradeoffs for section 4.2.2.
     * Action CL 2004/05/14: Rewrite story at beginning of 3.3.1.
       Consider deleting para that follows last sentence third para after
       story in 3.3.1. "Note also that since dereferencing a URI (e.g.,
       using HTTP) does not involve sending a fragment identifier to a
       server or other agent, certain access methods (e.g., HTTP PUT,
       POST, and DELETE) cannot be used to interact with secondary
       resources."
     * Completd Action IJ: Remove the middle bullet from 2.3 (done in 8
       June draft).
     * Action TBL 2004/06/08: For issue hawke7, ask Sandro for
       clarification on whether second URI should have "#". Done: Sandro
       said that the hashes were not the point, but that the point was
       that in the context of dereferencing, it does matter which URI you
       use. Note: IJ has removed the paragraph in the 8 June draft.

     [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/webarch-20040608/

   Resources:
    1. [15]Last Call issues list ([16]sorted by section)
    2. [17]Annotated version of WebArch
    3. Archive of [18]public-webarch-comments
    4. [19]List of actions by TAG participant

     [15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/issues.html
     [16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/concerning.html
     [17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/webarchWithIssues.html
     [18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/
     [19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/actions_owner.html

     _________________________________________________________________

   The TAG does not expect to discuss issues below this line.

3. Status report on these findings

   See also [20]TAG findings
     * [21]abstractComponentRefs-37:
          + 30 Oct 2003 draft finding "[22]Abstract Component References"
     * [23]contentPresentation-26:
          + 30 June 2003 draft finding "[24]Separation of semantic and
            presentational markup, to the extent possible, is
            architecturally sound"
     * [25]metadataInURI-31
     * [26]siteData-36
          + "[27]There is no such thing as a Web site"

     [20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
     [21] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#abstractComponentRefs-37
     [22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/abstractComponentRefs-20031030
     [23] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentPresentation-26
     [24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/contentPresentation-26-20030630.html
     [25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31
     [26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#siteData-36
     [27] http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/01/08/WebSite36

4. Other action items

     * Action DC 2003/11/15: Follow up on KeepPOSTRecords with Janet Daly
       on how to raise awareness of this point (which is in CUAP).
     * Action CL 2003/10/27: Draft XML mime type thingy with Murata-san

     _________________________________________________________________


    Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL
    Last modified: $Date: 2004/06/09 21:02:22 $


-- 
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447