- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 20:07:10 -0800
- To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>, "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>, "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hp.com>, "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
AFAIK this change was NOT instigated by the XMLP WG; IIRC it was the Team. The first mention of it that I can find in the WG's records is when a third party brought it up on the public list: http://www.w3.org/mid/028c01c3c5b8$361fbd90$6401a8c0@northgate I'd also note that XMLP's charter itself uses /TR/SOAP/ to refer to the SOAP 1.1 document (NOT "the latest version of SOAP." On Jan 16, 2004, at 8:30 AM, Dare Obasanjo wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] >> On Behalf Of Mark Baker >> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 4:49 AM >> To: Williams, Stuart >> Cc: www-tag@w3.org >> Subject: Re: What does http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP identify? >> >> >> FWIW, if you consult the Google Oracle for backlinks ... >> >> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&safe=o >> ff&c2coff=1&q=link%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2FSOAP&btnG=G >> oogle+Search >> >> You'll see that most of those pages use the URI to refer to >> SOAP 1.1, rather than "SOAP in general". > > In fact Googling for "SOAP 1.1" brings up http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP as > the first URI returned. I find it quite irritating that the SOAP > working > group did not follow the practices of other working groups such as XML > Query working group and choose a new URI for the subsequent version. > > PS: By the way, this points out an inconsistency in URI naming policies > by the W3C. > > -- > PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM > Entropy isn't what it used to be. > > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no > rights.
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2004 23:09:01 UTC