- From: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:30:03 -0800
- To: <www-tag@w3.org>, "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>, "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hp.com>
- Cc: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
>-----Original Message----- >From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] >On Behalf Of Mark Baker >Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 4:49 AM >To: Williams, Stuart >Cc: www-tag@w3.org >Subject: Re: What does http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP identify? > > >FWIW, if you consult the Google Oracle for backlinks ... > >http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&safe=o >ff&c2coff=1&q=link%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2FSOAP&btnG=G >oogle+Search > >You'll see that most of those pages use the URI to refer to >SOAP 1.1, rather than "SOAP in general". In fact Googling for "SOAP 1.1" brings up http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP as the first URI returned. I find it quite irritating that the SOAP working group did not follow the practices of other working groups such as XML Query working group and choose a new URI for the subsequent version. PS: By the way, this points out an inconsistency in URI naming policies by the W3C. -- PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM Entropy isn't what it used to be. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Received on Friday, 16 January 2004 11:29:50 UTC