Re: About RDDL 2.0

[Copy of my post on xml-dev on this subject]

I second Eric's worries -- I've been using RDDL(1) very successfully,
and am not happy with the loss of functionality in what you've
proposed for RDDL(2).

It's not obvious to me how the new proposal would work for something
as straightforward as the W3C XML Schema namespace document [1].

ht

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema.html
-- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

-- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

Received on Monday, 19 January 2004 13:48:58 UTC