W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2004

Re: The xmlChunk-44 problem statement

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:13:41 -0500
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <87k72rki1m.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM> was heard to say:
| I think the issue xmlChunk-44 asks, essentially:
|  1. Should there be a standard way to communicate context information
|     for a portion of an XML document?
|  2. If so, what should it be?
|  3. And to what extent should it provide a "canonical" form?

One obvious place to look for an answer is XML Fragment Interchange[1]
which seems, on casual reflection, to provide most of the answers.

                                        Be seeing you,

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/CR-xml-fragment-20010212
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Received on Thursday, 12 February 2004 18:14:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:03 UTC