Re: Rough sketch for an I-D (a successor of RFC 3023) from Henry S. Thompson on 2003-10-31 (www-tag@w3.org from October 2003)

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:53:24 +0000
To: MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5by8v1nybf.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

I strongly believe that we need a frag-id syntax for */xml, and that
it should be as recommended by the XLink WG as was [1].  I will argue
the point in whatever forum is agreed to be appropriate.

ht

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-fragid/#d0e135
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                      Half-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

Received on Friday, 31 October 2003 11:53:25 UTC