- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:05:11 -0600
- To: MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
- Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 17:33, MURATA Makoto wrote: [...] > > MM> I think that further discussion about the content of this I-D > > MM> should be moved to the IETF-XML-MIME ML. > > > > I prefer a list and a process that I understand well. > > I prefer an IETF ML an RFC at this stage of the game. First, Ned's > update is not an RFC yet. Second, if we are going to create an RFC > (as suggested in the TAG minutes), an IETF ML is a better place. I have no strong preference either way, but as far as I know, the ietf-xml-mime mailing list isn't any more or less endorsed by the IETF than any other public mailing list. ietf-xml-mime-request@imc.org is hosted by the Internet Mail Consortium. http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-mime/index.html It's not the mailing list of an IETF working group, nor is it endorsed by the IESG in any particular way, as far as I know. Regardless of official endorsement, the scope of ietf-xml-mime seems to match this task quite nicely. I guess I mildly prefer ietf-xml-mime to www-tag for the bulk of the discussion. I'm sure Chris and others will keep the TAG informed to the extent we need to know stuff. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:05:13 UTC