Re: Proposed restatement of syntax-based interoperability principle ( was RE: Action item on syntax-based interoperability) from Tim Bray on 2003-10-29 (www-tag@w3.org from October 2003)

From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 02:30:04 -0800
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org, "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Message-Id: <DBEB2288-09FA-11D8-9AAC-000A95A51C9E@textuality.com>

On Oct 27, 2003, at 2:09 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:

> Let's see what happens if I mix that with
> the text Bray offered Tue, 21 Oct 2003 18:26:14 -0700
> and salt to taste:

I'm OK with the thrust of Dan's comments.  The last sentence "Web 
architecture has been successful in focusing on concrete syntax and 
protocols shared between Agents" is a bit fluffy, being successful in 
focusing on this well so what.  I'd be OK with a statement that web 
arch has been successful because of focusing on this stuff, or 
alternately just a statement of fact that web arch has focused on it. 
-Tim

Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2003 05:32:46 UTC